Which conflict management style exhibits low cooperativeness and low assertiveness?

The choice of avoidance as the conflict management style that exhibits low cooperativeness and low assertiveness is accurate. This style is characterized by a tendency to sidestep conflict rather than confront it directly. Individuals who use this approach do not actively seek to meet their own needs (low assertiveness) nor do they try to understand or accommodate the needs of others (low cooperativeness).

Avoidance can manifest as withdrawing from the situation, ignoring the conflict, or even postponing resolution altogether. This style may seem beneficial in situations where the conflict is trivial or when potential harm from the conflict outweighs its benefits. However, it often leads to unresolved issues, which can accumulate and create larger problems over time.

In contrast, the competing style emphasizes high assertiveness but low cooperativeness, focusing on winning the conflict at the expense of others. Collaborating showcases high assertiveness and high cooperativeness, where parties aim for win-win solutions. Compromising involves moderate levels of both assertiveness and cooperativeness, where both parties seek to give up something in order to reach an agreement. Thus, avoidance uniquely fits the criteria of low assertiveness and low cooperativeness.